2 ms·
and fibrechannel, and various other protocols too. The point being that ethernet+IP/TCP is uniquely poor/difficult at offload and the minimum packet sizes are t
by StillBored 7y ago
and fibrechannel, and various other protocols too. The point being that ethernet+IP/TCP is uniquely poor/difficult at offload and the minimum packet sizes are tiny.
TCP is genius for a WAN, but unlike most things designed in the past 25 or so years, robustness precedes performance.
- gnufx 7y agoKernel bypass isn't the same thing as offload. I don't understand "minimum packet sizes are tiny". The 1980s system was driving Ethernet, just not with Unix/sockets.