> Microsoft is truly serious about Linux, if anyone was left wondering. You forgot to mention how you've come to this conclusion. History doesn't suggest the s

> Microsoft is truly serious about Linux, if anyone was left wondering. You forgot to mention how you've come to this conclusion. History doesn't suggest the same thing you seem to be suggesting. They've always been serious about Linux. But more about how to get Linux out of their way. If anyone is left wondering, and you've got the answer, it'd be nice to see something more substantial as to why we shouldn't be wondering anymore. It's true that there could be synergy. But that was the case back when it was clear MOST websites were coming from Linux servers than Windows, in spite of Microsoft's constant claims of being on the forefront there. They weren't. They still aren't. I'm definitely still "left wondering."