3 ms·

Thanks for replying! 2) I didn't mean it would guarantee a proof, I just meant it would attempt a proof up to the limit of its type checker's ability to prove

by SilasX 7y ago

Thanks for replying! 2) I didn't mean it would guarantee a proof, I just meant it would attempt a proof up to the limit of its type checker's ability to prove type validity.

robbieo 7y ago
Ah, sure, you could use a mapped type – but given that the actual program starts failing around 3 I don't see a ton of utility.