3 ms·

>You got too emotional when reading my response. I read a dispassionate rebuttal of your point. Calling the reply "too emotional" is not an okay tactic.

• AznHisoka 7y ago
  “Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.” https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
  • dointheatl 7y ago
    And you just responded to the weaker interpretation of his argument (which is easier to criticize) when you called it "too emotional."
    • AznHisoka 7y ago
      And you responded to the weaker interpretation of my argument. And so we are in a loop. my orig response was an innocent, curious question while his was an impulsive rant/essay.
      • dointheatl 7y ago
        >You got too emotional when reading my response. I'm not sure there is any stronger interpretation available here. You're baselessly speculating on gp's emotional state. That is the opposite of "assume good faith."