4 ms·
Your argument here largely boils down to, "you are biased because anecdotal evidence." If you knew nothing about heroin, and then watched a bunch of people get
by codingslave 7y ago
Your argument here largely boils down to, "you are biased because anecdotal evidence." If you knew nothing about heroin, and then watched a bunch of people get addicted, you wouldn't say, "Well were they rich or poor? Could have been a biased sample set."
- mistermann 7y agoKind of. I'd say it's more than you are making an assertion of fact (conclusive truth) based on anecdotes that consider an insufficient number of variables and samples. If you were instead expressing an opinion I'd have no complaint. Perhaps I've misinterpreted you?