Some (constructive) criticism of the db so far. I do realize that it's (at the moment) manually curated, but I still think it applies: * Twitter. One of the bi

Some (constructive) criticism of the db so far. I do realize that it's (at the moment) manually curated, but I still think it applies: * Twitter. One of the biggest websites out there right now, that also includes number of extensions only have 2 listed. * Facebook has 5. Disconnect or Facebook cleaner is however not among them. * Gmail. Lots of extensions. Most fall within 2 categories and fullfill mostly the same purposes. If these are manually curated, why not do some editorialization? Makes it easier for me as an end-user to chose, and ultimately find value in your extension. * Reddit. It shows one extension and that is a general extension for blocking social link stuff from external pages. How about all the other extensions? Votes, Inbox-checker, etc? I found them via a quick google. I guess if this extension takes of (and you make it obvious how to submit recommendations), you will need to automate more of the process, or you will be drowned in extensions people feel are missing. That and SPAM.