3 ms·
It “has to be the case” because the company has fewer than 500 employees? That’s very weak reasoning. Is no story about mismanagement at a company with fewer th
by baddox 7y ago
It “has to be the case” because the company has fewer than 500 employees? That’s very weak reasoning. Is no story about mismanagement at a company with fewer than 500 employees genuine? They’re all just manufactured PR stunts? Can you in any way justify this bizarre claim?