3 ms·

Try this for something more objective: http://www.arxiv-sanity.com/top?timefilter=year&vfilter=all http://www.arxiv-sanity.com/top?timefilter=year&vfilter=all

• toxik 7y ago
  While that certainly gives some signal among the noise, it is also heavily skewed towards Twitterable papers. Clickbaity papers fare better.
  • jointpdf 7y ago
    I think the rankings are based on the papers that people save. There is a separate page for Twitter based rankings, which seems noisier (ie top paper from the last month is about Hearthstone). It does seem that survey/review/tutorial type papers are slightly over represented. No ranked list is ever perfect, but this passes the eye test IMO.
    • toxik 7y ago
      Ah I’ve been reading the wrong list!