Agreed. While I believe the article points out the gruesomeness, it also carefully notes how much less collateral damage is likely. I came away from the articl

Agreed. While I believe the article points out the gruesomeness, it also carefully notes how much less collateral damage is likely. I came away from the article a bit sickened by the concept, yes, but also proud we have a weapon whose purpose is to avoid accidental civilian deaths. And I have to admit, as gory as this weapon sounds, it's no worse than explosives. I don't like war. I figure no one in their right mind should. I do acknowledge there's a time for it, and even a time for assassination (i.e. al Qaeda and similar). I pray our leaders are able to make the right decisions regarding when these things are needed, and I'm nervous that some of our leaders don't fit that bill (moreso, that a future crop of leaders might abuse these powers to terrible ends).