3 ms·
The study covered the time period 2005-2017, which coincides with the rapid growth of tech in the Bay Area (particularly SF) so it makes more sense in that cont
by nyc640 7y ago
The study covered the time period 2005-2017, which coincides with the rapid growth of tech in the Bay Area (particularly SF) so it makes more sense in that context.
- omarhaneef 7y agoYeah, I guess the top 3 have so much momentum. I was just surprised to see that Boston, San Diego, Raleigh, Madison beat out Austin and NYC in absolute numbers.
- ghaff 7y agoThe numbers don't include finance which is probably why no NYC. San Diego is a bit surprising but Boston presumably counts all the biotech in Cambridge in addition to the satellite offices of the various West Coast "tech" companies and other high-tech.
- wayoutthere 7y agoThis; the "satellite effect" is huge in NYC -- sometimes the NYC satellite campuses are bigger than the main ones. If a company has a second location, it's usually NYC.