I don't see the relevance of what you're saying? At best it is an attack on the man and not on what he's saying. If his arguments are incorrect, correct them. D

I don't see the relevance of what you're saying? At best it is an attack on the man and not on what he's saying. If his arguments are incorrect, correct them. Don't smugly point out his work history as if it somehow contributed to the conversation. Edit: This cropped up on HN a few days ago again, http://paulgraham.com/disagree.html http://paulgraham.com/disagree.html I feel "DH1" covers what I'm trying to say to you.