5 ms·
Love the idea from an absurdity aspect. Accuracy is very low, portability requires a vehicle, wear is quite high on the "outside" side of the channel. Feels a
by irjustin 7y ago
Love the idea from an absurdity aspect.
Accuracy is very low, portability requires a vehicle, wear is quite high on the "outside" side of the channel.
Feels as effective as a repeating shotgun mounted on a car.
- lightedman 7y ago"Feels as effective as a repeating shotgun mounted on a car. " Dunno, an AA-12 loaded with HE-12 explosive rounds mounted on a car or truck could be a very effective mid-range area of denial tool.
- _djo_ 7y agoSee the PAW-20 for an example of this taken to its logical conclusion.
- dmos62 7y agoGood overview of PAW-20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHbqHx3TLBE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHbqHx3TLBE
- bradknowles 7y agoWow. That was a wild hour-long trip down into weird and wonderful weapons! Thank you!
- Sharlin 7y agoI wonder just how low the accuracy was (well, to be a pedant, I presume the main problem was precision rather than accuracy). The 99% use case for machine gun fire (and indeed rifle fire in modern warfare) is suppression.
- KineticLensman 7y ago"Thank the Lord / That we have got / The Gatling Gun / And they have not"
- ajuc 7y agoI know this as "Whatever happens we have got the Maxim gun and they have not."