46 ms·
It seems like the sort of thing that should already be covered under existing property laws then. I'm not really sure what the need is to create an entirely ne
by voldacar 7y ago
It seems like the sort of thing that should already be covered under existing property laws then.
I'm not really sure what the need is to create an entirely new concept called "ecocide" when you could just consider it destruction of property/theft/vandalism/whatever
- pimmen 7y agoThe problem is that property laws are local or national, because it's assumed that I need physical access to your property to do anything. If I fire a rocket at your property from some other country, I would be violating all kinds of air space regulations or maybe even international treaties on weapons. We now have a better understanding of the unintended, global consequences of small, national actions.
- voldacar 7y agoThen it seems like the real need is for a better international enforcement mechanism. As cancerous as it is, maybe international copyright law could be an inspiration? I'm just highly skeptical of creating a whole new category of offense when our existing legal framework should already have ways of dealing with this kind of externality