4 ms·
If you’re a bystander, what you want is for foreign governments to stop firing ammunitions at you. No ones saying that precision targeting isn’t the lesser of t
by elil17 7y ago
If you’re a bystander, what you want is for foreign governments to stop firing ammunitions at you. No ones saying that precision targeting isn’t the lesser of two evils, but the “anti war press” is outraged for a reason: the number of innocent people the United States should be murdering is not “fewer,” but zero
- esyir 7y agoYes, and better precision is how you get that, especially with the targets deliberately using said innocents as shields.
- elil17 7y agoI mean sure, precision is one way to get that. Not firing missiles is the other way. I like my way because it doesn't cost millions of dollars and assume that the US government is qualified to judge who should live and die in other countries.
- duelingjello 7y agoPerpetual, pan-colonial war killing people almost at random from the sky without police or criminal justice due-process or a shred of HUMINT. It's viewed as acceptable because they're not Americans, so they're not human beings. And if you question it, you're dismissed as "just a lefty" because murdering people at random is apparently okay and good for the military-industrial complex economy.