3 ms·
Not sure what the "British equivalent of a judge" is other than, well, a judge. Court claims are expensive. This ultimately would've been heard in the High Cou
by matthewheath 7y ago
Not sure what the "British equivalent of a judge" is other than, well, a judge.
Court claims are expensive. This ultimately would've been heard in the High Court and the claimant would want decent counsel to represent him as well as a team of solicitors and other legal professionals to research and handle the correspondence — that's the bulk of the fees.
Then there's the cost of the application itself. The fee for starting a case is 5% of the amount for claims worth between £10,000 and £200,000.
In this case, that's almost £10,000 gone immediately on the court fee. For one case. There's also a court fee for the initial hearing and the return hearing for the freezing order.
Not sure how £12k was spent on the first case—article doesn't mention which court and suggests the High Court was only involved in the second case, but I suspect that isn't true.
- perl4ever 7y ago"The fee for starting a case is 5% of the amount for claims worth between £10,000 and £200,000." I don't believe it. If this was really the way the courts over there worked, then nobody would make disparaging comments about the American legal system.
- matthewheath 7y agoWhat's not to believe? You can look at the cost of filing a claim in the High Court online for yourself. I apologise for not making it clear — that fee is specifically for filing a claim in the High Court. Inferior courts will charge less.