5 ms·
It's important to break down unrealistic fantasies so that we don't get lulled into a false sense of security or complacency for major problems. Building a main
by gxon 7y ago
It's important to break down unrealistic fantasies so that we don't get lulled into a false sense of security or complacency for major problems. Building a maintainable civilization outside of Earth is likely a significantly harder problem than solving the climate crisis directly.
Having said that, goals to colonize space or terraform other planets could be immensely helpful at developing technologies to deal with our problems on Earth.
I've also never come across anyone who actually has the view that we don't need to deal with climate change because we can just leave Earth. Is that actually common?
If so, we're really not doing a good job of conveying how time critical the crisis is. We don't have the centuries we'll likely need to develop self sustaining off world civilizations before civilization here starts to break down. We have decades, maybe. Even if we develop the technology fast enough, we'll probably have exhausted all the cheap energy/resources needed to deploy it at scale.
- Kim_Bruning 7y agoI'm not sure you're correct about colonization being harder than fixing local problems. By starting new colonies afresh, you avoid a large amount of legacy issues and political inertia. It can be a lot easier to start a new colony than to convince everyone in the homeland to change their traditional ways. That's one reason why I think colonization has always been on the table in the western world, with varying success over the past millennia.