3 ms·
Sincerely, which do you think is more feasible? Reducing emissions in a number of countries you can count on one hand or moving billions of people off to anothe
by noobermin 7y ago
Sincerely, which do you think is more feasible? Reducing emissions in a number of countries you can count on one hand or moving billions of people off to another planet on technology that doesn't even exist yet?
We know the technology to reduce GHG's, it's already here. We just aren't doing it for what I think are foolish reasons.
- jelliclesfarm 7y agoWe also know about contraception. But that isn’t going to stop the population from hitting 10 billion by 2050. The best way to solve climate crisis is to reduce world population leading to less consumption and GHG reduction.
- noobermin 7y agoI'm not sure that will solve it in the way you're thinking it will. The global poor are not responsible for GHG's because they don't produce it, most of the GHG (per capita and through consumption) belong to the US particularly and some European countries (Russia in particular).