Sorry about that. They are violating Eprivacy, not the GDPR, because they are dropping tracers without proper consent. But they are violating it because the con

Sorry about that. They are violating Eprivacy, not the GDPR, because they are dropping tracers without proper consent. But they are violating it because the consent they are collecting is not valid in the definition given in the GDPR. The previous understanding of Eprivacy (before the GPDR) admitted a "soft consent", ie "keep reading and you consent". That is not longer the case because of GDPR. What they do with the data they collect is subject to the GPDR, but the use of tracers without consent is subject to Eprivacy. Hope it's more understandable!