4 ms·
> specifically politicians and law enforcement officials How about known criminals. More cameras owned and controlled (for real) by individuals is enough. I ha
by microcolonel 7y ago
> specifically politicians and law enforcement officials
How about known criminals. More cameras owned and controlled (for real) by individuals is enough. I have heard about massive improvements in public safety in places where people have Ring, or similar things. I'm not too keen on Amazon being an operator, as unfortunate as it would be if they were judged for things they don't do, it'd be worse if it turned out to be a genuine dragnet.
Nonetheless, I'm not anti surveillance, provided it's up to individual and business location operators to disseminate or not (except by subpoena). I plan on installing more surveillance cameras.
- badrabbit 7y agoAnd that bullshit is what they use to argue for it as well. It's not just a camera, that's the whole point. How the tech can be abused needs to be understood and relevant laws need to be implemented like yesterday.