Your argument starts with a false premise, which is that because the providers code the delivery of high-speed internet as a "consumer service" that it is thus

Your argument starts with a false premise, which is that because the providers code the delivery of high-speed internet as a "consumer service" that it is thus not a right. By your same logic, if I began charging people to have access to the court system and a fair trial (which is arguably the case in the US today anyway) and treat the judicial system as a "consumer service," then it would cease to be a right. That is hardly an argument, I'm sorry to say.