4 ms·

Sure, but Brave and BAT are as painless as it gets: • you get a grant of BAT to pay content creators on the web, YouTube, Twitter, etc. when you sign up • Bra

Sure, but Brave and BAT are as painless as it gets: • you get a grant of BAT to pay content creators on the web, YouTube, Twitter, etc. when you sign up • Brave can (optionally) automatically allocates BAT to the content creators you visit the most based on the amount of time you spend on their sites • you can opt-in if you wish to see ads related to things you're interested in and get paid in BAT • for BAT you earn, you have the option to pay content creators or cashout to fiat (dollars, euros, yen, etc.) Right now, Uphold is the gateway between earnings in BAT and fiat, but they're also working on integrating with Coinbase as well: https://www.reddit.com/r/BATProject/comments/cqjv7a/native_crypto_wallet_appears_in_brave_nightly/exdhe0g https://www.reddit.com/r/BATProject/comments/cqjv7a/native_c...

fuu_dev 7y ago
Would you mind explaining why any 3rd party coin is more painless then any popular native pay service that does not need additional steps?
- LegitShady 7y ago
  What do you mean by native pay services?
  - fuu_dev 7y ago
    Services that work with real money and not over a virtual currency.
    - LegitShady 7y ago
      The whole point is no money is invoked for the browser user unless they want to go to the frog me of withdrawing the bat they earned. Instead they can just assign it to someone they support That's what's superior. Real money services require someone to pay real money. This system could be done without the coin but I bet it would be more difficult to arrange transfer to each browser user.
      - fuu_dev 7y ago
        Like Money services crypto currency services also cost money. Here is an article about it: https://www.investopedia.com/tech/how-much-does-it-cost-buy-cryptocurrency-exchanges/ https://www.investopedia.com/tech/how-much-does-it-cost-buy-...
- spsful 7y ago
  The biggest thing is you don't have to contribute actual money. Instead of watching the website's intrusive, tracker-ridden ads, you're receiving custom ones from Brave tailored to you based on a local machine learning profile. You're watching ads on your own, separate from the ad networks used by the websites, and so you get a virtual token that can be sent to creators you like. They can convert it to actual cash (you can too if you want).
  - fuu_dev 7y ago
    Creating a virtual currency sounds like a abstraction layer that has no real benefit to me.
Nursie 7y ago
As with all of these systems, where it's likely to fall down is that the monetary amount you receive for viewing ads will be so miniscule as to be inconsequential.
BlueTemplar 7y ago
How is this more painless than Flattr (2.0) if I'm not interested in ads in the first place?
- BostonEnginerd 7y ago
  Brave is supposed to be privacy preserving - neither the site, nor Brave should know which sites you are supporting if I recall correctly.
  - BlueTemplar 7y ago
    Oh, so that's what the blockchain does for them ? I admit that I would hate to see Flattr become a monopolistic payment platform that knows everything abou the websites you visit... but which also seemed inevitable as they have to determine how much to pay to whom ?

fuu_dev 7y ago

Would you mind explaining why any 3rd party coin is more painless then any popular native pay service that does not need additional steps?

LegitShady 7y ago
What do you mean by native pay services?
- fuu_dev 7y ago
  Services that work with real money and not over a virtual currency.
  - LegitShady 7y ago
    The whole point is no money is invoked for the browser user unless they want to go to the frog me of withdrawing the bat they earned. Instead they can just assign it to someone they support That's what's superior. Real money services require someone to pay real money. This system could be done without the coin but I bet it would be more difficult to arrange transfer to each browser user.
    - fuu_dev 7y ago
      Like Money services crypto currency services also cost money. Here is an article about it: https://www.investopedia.com/tech/how-much-does-it-cost-buy-cryptocurrency-exchanges/ https://www.investopedia.com/tech/how-much-does-it-cost-buy-...
spsful 7y ago
The biggest thing is you don't have to contribute actual money. Instead of watching the website's intrusive, tracker-ridden ads, you're receiving custom ones from Brave tailored to you based on a local machine learning profile. You're watching ads on your own, separate from the ad networks used by the websites, and so you get a virtual token that can be sent to creators you like. They can convert it to actual cash (you can too if you want).
- fuu_dev 7y ago
  Creating a virtual currency sounds like a abstraction layer that has no real benefit to me.

Nursie 7y ago

As with all of these systems, where it's likely to fall down is that the monetary amount you receive for viewing ads will be so miniscule as to be inconsequential.

BlueTemplar 7y ago

How is this more painless than Flattr (2.0) if I'm not interested in ads in the first place?

BostonEnginerd 7y ago
Brave is supposed to be privacy preserving - neither the site, nor Brave should know which sites you are supporting if I recall correctly.
- BlueTemplar 7y ago
  Oh, so that's what the blockchain does for them ? I admit that I would hate to see Flattr become a monopolistic payment platform that knows everything abou the websites you visit... but which also seemed inevitable as they have to determine how much to pay to whom ?