3 ms·
I don't want to accuse anyone of astroturfing, but the comments in this thread seem to be eerily positive and very marketing-y. Maybe it's my skepticism of ever
by adtac 7y ago
I don't want to accuse anyone of astroturfing, but the comments in this thread seem to be eerily positive and very marketing-y. Maybe it's my skepticism of everything crypto-related being incredibly biased one way or another.
- alwillis 7y agoDisclaimer: I’ve been using/testing Brave for the last few years. I've seen it evolve from what was basically a proof of concept running in Electron to what it is today. I believe if you care to do some research, you'll see that the Brave team has put in the work to be taken seriously. I get why people are skeptical, especially in this day and age. But the concept for Brave and disrupting the surveillance capitalism known as ad tech goes back to 2013; Brave is not a johnny-come-lately thing[1]. This was started by Brendan Eich, the same guy who created JavaScipt and who started Mozilla which gave us Firefox; it's not like he's someone who doesn't understand how this stuff works. [1]: https://basicattentiontoken.org/the-road-to-brave-one-dot-zero/ https://basicattentiontoken.org/the-road-to-brave-one-dot-ze...
- natmaka 7y agoEvery potentially unpleasant Brave feature is easy to disable (and often by-default disabled). Is is very good at ad-filtering, snappy and responsive, stable, can be audited (opensource)... and the underlying ways to provide for creators/publishers (and also people liking/needing advertising) are clever and disruptive. Brave is worth a try. I'm not paid for this (and there is no 'conflict of interest').