I think it makes total sense to question if a CEO can be part-time and be effective (I agree with the author of this post, they can't). That being said, this po

I think it makes total sense to question if a CEO can be part-time and be effective (I agree with the author of this post, they can't). That being said, this post is all over the place. > Greatness is in the agency of others, and many talented executives have left the firm. Uh huh. Twitter has always succeeded in spite of itself. There's never been any innovation and execution has been middling at best. I don't think there were ever "great" executives on board, and if there was, they didn't accomplish anything. The rest of the post is just a stereotypical political rant about Russian bots and Trump. If there's a problem with the culture of Twitter's user base, much of the blame must lie on those with blue checkmarks. It's a toxic community.