4 ms·
Great response. I wouldn't have used the term "click fraud," but the analogy is easy to grasp (ie, that the "test" purposely attempts to strengthen an associat
by jpwagner 16y ago
Great response. I wouldn't have used the term "click fraud," but the analogy is easy to grasp (ie, that the "test" purposely attempts to strengthen an association between things that are not associated.)
- lysium 16y agoHow is that a great response? It does not address the allegations at all, just claims the allegations are insulting. The only great thing I see is that the blog post actually confirms what Google said. Because otherwise, it would have been easy for Microsoft to put the finger at the point where Google is wrong.
- jpwagner 16y agoI think this response is convincing. Period. Full stop.
- jongraehl 16y agoWhy would anyone upvote a completely ambiguous comment (what is "this response")? You thought the ambiguity was intentional?
- jpwagner 16y agoWere you also confused by the previous comment when it asked "How is that a great response?"
- memetichazard 16y ago"How is that" clearly refers to Bing's response. I'll admit that I interpreted your post "I think this response is convincing" as referring to lysium's response to your post. It may have been clearer if you had written 'the response', or more directly, 'Microsoft/Bing's response'.
- lysium 16y agoMaybe jpwagner was just joking from the very beginning and we didn't get it?