> how come we (think we) have free will?' That’s easier than you think: what those who use that term for discussions understand that term to mean is mostly bas

> how come we (think we) have free will?' That’s easier than you think: what those who use that term for discussions understand that term to mean is mostly based on work made by religious apologists through the centuries. So the answer to “how come” is “to somehow excuse the concept of having all-mighty all-knowing god while people still do whatever.” Thus so constructed “free will” is the limit over which that all mighty can’t cross. That’s why it’s so emotionally defended.