You essentially disregard one weak argument, and replace it with a worse one: "negative effect on society...both on the gene pool and on equality". First you c

You essentially disregard one weak argument, and replace it with a worse one: "negative effect on society...both on the gene pool and on equality". First you contradict your original dismissal, any negative effects on the gene pool most likely can be solved by more research. Asserting a negative effect on equality is an equally damaging and incorrect opinion. A similar analogy here would be arguing vaccines should be avoided and prevented because not everyone has access to them, thereby having negative effects on equality