I meant I like the features that have actually made it into the spec so far - all the stuff in the article is still at the proposal stage. I do agree that the

I meant I like the features that have actually made it into the spec so far - all the stuff in the article is still at the proposal stage. I do agree that the syntax proposed thus far for records and discriminated unions is far from pretty, but I can't see it making it into the spec like that.