2 ms·
Could be that one process spends much less time sleeping for IO thus still having the same wall clock time. In this case, there's probably only memory IO which
by rocqua 7y ago
Could be that one process spends much less time sleeping for IO thus still having the same wall clock time.
In this case, there's probably only memory IO which (afaik) cannot put a process to sleep.
- BeeOnRope 7y agoThere is no IO, and it is not memory intensive.