An important update has been made to the microbenchmarks to this page. I will quote for you my editorial comment: "Editor’s Note: The microbenchmarks in this a

An important update has been made to the microbenchmarks to this page. I will quote for you my editorial comment: "Editor’s Note: The microbenchmarks in this article have been updated to reflect the fact that running a single instance of stress-ng would skew the results in favor of the x86 platforms, since in SMT architectures a single thread may not be enough to use all resources available in the physical core. Thanks to our readers for bringing this to our attention." You'll note that the newly-used stress-ng command is: "stress-ng --metrics-brief --cache 16 --icache 16 --matrix 16 --cpu 16 --memcpy 16 --qsort 16 --dentry 16 --timer 16 -t 1m" The count on the flags under the old numbers was 1. This update shows even better numbers for Arm than we originally produced. Thanks to our assiduous readers for pointing this out. https://www.scylladb.com/2019/12/05/is-arm-ready-for-server-dominance/ https://www.scylladb.com/2019/12/05/is-arm-ready-for-server-...