3 ms·
I'm having trouble understanding why the randomly sprayed bits from the attacker to the client are even accepted at all at the crypto boundary. Shouldn't it har
by GhettoMaestro 7y ago
I'm having trouble understanding why the randomly sprayed bits from the attacker to the client are even accepted at all at the crypto boundary. Shouldn't it hard-fail (not decrypt) due to an invalid key?
- loeg 7y agoThe bits aren't VPN-framed packets; the attack isn't VPN specific. They're just sending ordinary TCP setup packets and ordinary TCP stream packets with fudged parameters until they find the right ones by brute force. It's a really noisy attack that uses weaknesses in packet routing to find existing TCP sessions and inject into them. It's also, like, an escalation from a relatively high privilege level. You need both a passive network observer (compromised router or ISP) and a noisy, active LAN device (to inject IP addresses that a router would filter as bogons). That's not to say this is crazy hard; these are definitely within the reach of a motivated attacker. Routers were the original the-S-in-IoT-is-for-security, and if you've got an IoT type device on the LAN it's probably vulnerable once you've popped the router.