5 ms·
Their landing page doesn't work without JS enabled, not even a single line of text. I wouldn't recommend this to build a landing page. If the objective of a la
by ghego1 7y ago
Their landing page doesn't work without JS enabled, not even a single line of text. I wouldn't recommend this to build a landing page.
If the objective of a landing page is to reach the largest audience possible in a sustainable, fast and efficient way, I wouldn't choose any SPA solution. And I must add that this comes from experience. For few years I did try to go the SPA way, with server side rendering, but the extra work and overheads are just not worth it.
IMHO, nothing beats static pages for landings.
- fastbeef 7y ago> I wouldn't recommend this to build a landing page. If the objective of a landing page is to reach the largest audience possible I dunno. This means you're excluding people who disable JS from your audience. I'm going to stick out my neck a suggest that they're probably very few and very unlikely to spend money on your product (my bias) > extra work and overheads are just not worth it. I'd say the other way around, this tool will get you a fast, single page site in shorter time than it will take for you to decide which static site generator to use (I'm being facetious)