This blog post is highly misleading and poorly-informed. The author of it does not seem to know that climate scientists do test their models against reality, l

This blog post is highly misleading and poorly-informed. The author of it does not seem to know that climate scientists do test their models against reality, leading him/her to waste a lot of words explaining how cargo cult science is bad, and how overfitting is being done, etc. These points are valid in the abstract, but don't represent how real climate science works. Amazingly, the author at one point says: "In proper science, the different theories are bloodily competing with each other." as a contrast to climate science, where supposedly these models are just peacefully cooperating to raise more funds. Anyone who has been in the middle of a conference where people with competing models are comparing results (to each other and to observations) knows how off-base this is.