3 ms·
The motive could be “think twice before dismissing climate scientists because they have a pretty good track record.” Your interpretation seems to display the ex
by take_a_breath 7y ago
The motive could be “think twice before dismissing climate scientists because they have a pretty good track record.” Your interpretation seems to display the exact bias you are attributing to others.
- daenz 7y agoThe bias I'm suggesting is an appeal to authority, and you'll have to be more clear on how I'm displaying that, since I am neither suggesting I am an expert, nor am I showing off my long history of "being right" about other things.
- hcknwscommenter 7y agoIt's not an appeal to authority when they back it up with data and numerical analysis.
- daenz 7y agoYou can back up study X with all the data and numerical analysis in the world, and it still doesn't increase study Y being right, except through appeal to authority.