Svante Arrhenius got it basically right in 1896 [1]. There is no scientific controversy and there never has been. Unfortunately, arguing about this might just

Svante Arrhenius got it basically right in 1896 [1]. There is no scientific controversy and there never has been. Unfortunately, arguing about this might just reinforce the mistaken view that there are different valid "sides" to this. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_... Edit: That doesn't detract from the article's more subtle point about the precision of climate models in the past, I was reacting to the comments here viewing this in the light of a fictive controversy.