> I'm not even sure how a frequentist would construct a model to estimate an outcome with no observations. The same way a Bayesian would, since it's a question

> I'm not even sure how a frequentist would construct a model to estimate an outcome with no observations. The same way a Bayesian would, since it's a question about probabilities of hypothetical experiments, not about statistics. Or you go through decision theory instead of mucking about with half baked ideologies. > being Bayesian is modelled on how humans process and contextualise decisions. This is false.