If I understand AMP correctly, there are 3 alternatives to compare: (1) Google doesn't intervene at all, web sites are full of bloat (2) Google requires mobil

If I understand AMP correctly, there are 3 alternatives to compare: (1) Google doesn't intervene at all, web sites are full of bloat (2) Google requires mobile sites to not suck if they want decent rankings (3) Google requires mobile sites to not suck and also delivers the bits instead of the site's servers. I agree that #1 is not a good state of affairs. I'm fine with Google pressuring mobile developers to create sites that perform well. I just prefer #2 over #3.