5 ms·

I have to see which works best for Apple anyway. I think Backblaze is best for that.

lambda_tango 7y ago
Backblaze personal backup used to only keep files for 30 days from your last activity, although I see they now let you keep old files for a year, for an extra $2/month. Personally, I use Arq Backup and Backblaze B2 (their “real” cloud storage). Arq is a one-time paid app that does differential encrypted backups to your choice of local storage or cloud provider. Keeping 1TB of backups cost me around $5 per month, and the files won’t disappear on me if my computer stops working for a month. https://www.arqbackup.com/ https://www.arqbackup.com/
- balladeer 7y ago
  If anyone looking to try it but wants something open source for a client, have a look at http://restic.net http://restic.net. Been using it to backup V MO to B2 for over a year now. Also, Arq is “one time buy” just for one version apparently.
  - vivid_truth 7y ago
    I've discovered Restic while playing with Golang, looks pretty neat. Have you had any issues with stability or corruption of your data? what are you using for encryption (if any?) thanks in advance.
    - allset_ 7y ago
      Restic backs up my NAS to B2 without issue. I don't have a file set that changes much though, but it includes backup verification via `restic check`
      - vivid_truth 7y ago
        Sounds good, I will def give it a go! (no pun intended) :)
- skinnymuch 7y ago
  That seems much cheaper than S3. I assume even Glacier isn’t that much cheaper per month and a pain to pay to take files out.
fnordprefect 7y ago
BackBlaze by far - I moved from CrashPlan when they screwed their consumer offering. BackBlaze has a stable client (even though it lives in system extensions) that uses fewer resources, as opposed to the buggy POS that is CrashPlan. IIRC CP client is Java, BB is native. BackBlaze's restore is far more robust (I got timeouts trying to restore large files from CP) and more intuitive.
- balladeer 7y ago
  Currently I neither use Backblaze or CrashPlan but restore was one of the few features (among other features like CP’s excellent versioning) where CP beat BB hands down. Heck, the last time I checked BB didn’t even let you restore using the client. You had to download the files from the portal and then put it somewhere yourself. I am not sure it has changed now. While CP’s was so seamless that it would just restore your files in the background wherever you wanted - at their original location or elsewhere. It worked so well. Yes, BB Java app was (is?) indeed a POS.

Backblaze personal backup used to only keep files for 30 days from your last activity, although I see they now let you keep old files for a year, for an extra $2/month. Personally, I use Arq Backup and Backblaze B2 (their “real” cloud storage). Arq is a one-time paid app that does differential encrypted backups to your choice of local storage or cloud provider. Keeping 1TB of backups cost me around $5 per month, and the files won’t disappear on me if my computer stops working for a month. https://www.arqbackup.com/ https://www.arqbackup.com/

balladeer 7y ago
If anyone looking to try it but wants something open source for a client, have a look at http://restic.net http://restic.net. Been using it to backup V MO to B2 for over a year now. Also, Arq is “one time buy” just for one version apparently.
- vivid_truth 7y ago
  I've discovered Restic while playing with Golang, looks pretty neat. Have you had any issues with stability or corruption of your data? what are you using for encryption (if any?) thanks in advance.
  - allset_ 7y ago
    Restic backs up my NAS to B2 without issue. I don't have a file set that changes much though, but it includes backup verification via `restic check`
    - vivid_truth 7y ago
      Sounds good, I will def give it a go! (no pun intended) :)
skinnymuch 7y ago
That seems much cheaper than S3. I assume even Glacier isn’t that much cheaper per month and a pain to pay to take files out.

fnordprefect 7y ago

BackBlaze by far - I moved from CrashPlan when they screwed their consumer offering. BackBlaze has a stable client (even though it lives in system extensions) that uses fewer resources, as opposed to the buggy POS that is CrashPlan. IIRC CP client is Java, BB is native. BackBlaze's restore is far more robust (I got timeouts trying to restore large files from CP) and more intuitive.

balladeer 7y ago
Currently I neither use Backblaze or CrashPlan but restore was one of the few features (among other features like CP’s excellent versioning) where CP beat BB hands down. Heck, the last time I checked BB didn’t even let you restore using the client. You had to download the files from the portal and then put it somewhere yourself. I am not sure it has changed now. While CP’s was so seamless that it would just restore your files in the background wherever you wanted - at their original location or elsewhere. It worked so well. Yes, BB Java app was (is?) indeed a POS.