3 ms·
> Stock price is valued as more important than choice for the consumer. By who? And why should those that value it more than choice for the consumer value choi
by ailideex 7y ago
> Stock price is valued as more important than choice for the consumer.
By who? And why should those that value it more than choice for the consumer value choice for the consumer more? And how would they even go about doing that?
- Wh1skey 7y ago> By who? By government officials creating anti-competitive regulations and taxes. > And why should those that value it more than choice for the consumer value choice for the consumer more? They should value choice for the consumer more because the total net benefit to society via GDP or any other economic indicator would be greater. > And how would they even go about doing that? Reducing barriers to entry for startups/small businesses and removing/reducing regulations that exert downward pressure on existing small businesses(Ex. minimum wage laws) are the first solutions that come to mind.