6 ms·
Attended a Blazor session at MS Build in May. My impression was, Blazor seems like a super cool tool that I will never be able to justify in production. For one
by Gene_Parmesan 7y ago
Attended a Blazor session at MS Build in May. My impression was, Blazor seems like a super cool tool that I will never be able to justify in production. For one, the performance is poor right now. Your options are either to use Signal to send every action over the network, or to deliver the entire .NET libraries along with the page. The size of that download is both impressively small (given the volume of code you're transferring), and also still way too large for me to feel comfortable foisting that on users.
Additionally, it requires that your front-end team feels comfortable working in .NET technologies. Ours certainly doesn't, and it would be very hard to sell my director on anything that doesn't maintain the traditional backend/frontend split.
- k__ 7y agoThanks. That was the one comment I was searching for. People are always talking about replacing JS, but then pump code to the client like nobodies business.
- cm2187 7y agoYeah, don’t use that for a blog (but please don’t use a SPA for a blog either). But think internal applications, legitimate SPA (webmail, trading platform), PWA.