You sound like a shining example of someone who believes that representation in a selected-for-some-attribute population should match the general population. T

You sound like a shining example of someone who believes that representation in a selected-for-some-attribute population should match the general population. That is a fallacy from the beginning, and I would encourage you to carefully justify to yourself why you believe that to be true. And this also just illustrates how difficult it is to debate on similar ground with a random person in a well-defined scope on these kinds of issues. I speak concretely of the things companies are able to achieve within the constraints and resources they're given. You speak of hopes and dreams. But more importantly (and worse), I think you seek to turn your hopes and dreams into unworkable policies that penalize people for not achieving your hopes and dreams.