4 ms·
The system worked this out with minimal damage (22k was paid out before the fraud was discovered) why should more labour be dedicated to detect such a trivial a
by munk-a 7y ago
The system worked this out with minimal damage (22k was paid out before the fraud was discovered) why should more labour be dedicated to detect such a trivial and rare error? If this sort of thing is rampant in australia then it'd make sense, but the detection of her fraud definitely cost less than beefing up reference checking to be in depth on everyone.
- bilbo0s 7y ago>why should more labour be dedicated to detect such a trivial and rare error? What is the data indicating this error is "rare" in the organization in question?
- munk-a 7y agoIt was news worthy and neither the article nor anything I've seen described this as a common or repeated occurrence, the article is pretty poor in quality but I think it's reasonable to read it as implying that this was a rather outstanding event. It is somewhat hard to judge but it seems a reasonable reading.