It only seems to be "not up for debate" because you say so. The product does not have any particular political goal, of course. But the choice of who it is sold

It only seems to be "not up for debate" because you say so. The product does not have any particular political goal, of course. But the choice of who it is sold to, for what purpose, and what price, absolutely is. My argument is that Github should use its right to "vote with its wallet" - since this is the only way to control outcomes in the economic sphere without the state - because in this case, the state is the objectionable party.