>I don't think it's very productive to divide the debate about AI and AGI in "pro-AI" and "anti-AI". I agree, but his article very much plays with the differen

>I don't think it's very productive to divide the debate about AI and AGI in "pro-AI" and "anti-AI". I agree, but his article very much plays with the different camps trope. If he had made an argument like you did, I would've upvoted it, but the way he makes that argument comes down to 'This one expert's prediction disagrees with a bunch of other experts prediction thus those other experts are wrong', which is silly.