I'm a very light editor, small dollar donor, and moderate user and I can say I'm pretty impressed with the platform improvements. The pace of change appears to

I'm a very light editor, small dollar donor, and moderate user and I can say I'm pretty impressed with the platform improvements. The pace of change appears to be very carefully managed to almost always be positive and minimize pointless disruption. The complaints in this thread are part of why you get those big, flashy redesigns that look great but hurt utility. Of course as a donor I'd never turn down more good for less money, but I don't think maximizing thriftiness always yields the best value. I'd rather things be just a little plush (if that's how you'd describe the current state) and see Wikipedia continue to succeed as it (largely) has.