4 ms·
I agree, this was 3x faster than expected. Note: Factoring RSA-240 only took 900 core-years the additional 3100 core-years were on the discrete log. RSA 240 i
by SethTro 7y ago
I agree, this was 3x faster than expected.
Note: Factoring RSA-240 only took 900 core-years the additional 3100 core-years were on the discrete log.
RSA 240 is 8 digits longer, it takes ~2x as much work for each 5.5 additional digits so this should have taken 2.7x as much compute.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]