3 ms·
The other guy did insult him first. It doesn’t really matter which words were used in either direction, they were both trying to engage in public ridicule. But
by lawnchair_larry 7y ago
The other guy did insult him first. It doesn’t really matter which words were used in either direction, they were both trying to engage in public ridicule. But Musk has more money, so he isn’t held to the same standard. I think they both look bad and the case should be thrown out.
Some convicted scammer claiming to be a private investigator who could get dirt on Unsworth ended up baiting Musk and offering his services for $50k. He sold him some lies about Unsworth, and Musk thought the guy was legit, so he later doubled down in the private email to a buzzfeed reporter, which was obviously promptly published.
- AndrewBissell 7y agoUnsworth was pissed because Musk's cave mini-sub white knight PR stunt was a huge, impractical distraction thrust on him at a time when speed and decisive action were of the essence. He used some choice words with an interviewer and, more to the point, never made baseless claims about Musk's background to a Twitter following of millions. To compare the two is just absurd.
- lawnchair_larry 7y agoThat’s a really bad excuse, and probably not true. If he didn’t want to be distracted, he could have simply not looked at twitter. Musk’s offer was obviously sincere, and if Unsworth found it unhelpful, the adult response is to politely decline. If you instead go to the media and pick a fight by using inflammatory claims and insults, you should not be surprised if someone hits back harder. To then go crying to the courts about defamation over a fight you started is just being an opportunistic weasel.
- AndrewBissell 7y agoDude, Musk actually showed up in Thailand and was leaning on local officials to insert himself into the rescue planning. Unsworth did not find out about him from Twitter.