4 ms·
I'm not arguing against proper research being done. You realize that there are, and you can see, before and after imagery - whether ultrasound, x-ray, or MRI -
by loceng 7y ago
I'm not arguing against proper research being done.
You realize that there are, and you can see, before and after imagery - whether ultrasound, x-ray, or MRI - that is used to see the physical trauma of the area being treated, treating it, and then seeing the healing that's occurred with imagery afterward, right? I'm guessing your limited sources don't actually share that information with you based on your lack of investigating any of this while being so dismissive, and counter arguing points I've not been making.
What I was warning of is regulatory capture that I've learned about directly from the legitimate doctors (not all are I'm sure) that are at the forefront of regenerative medicine, some who have been doing research on using stem cell for 18+ years now already.
I understand your skepticism - maybe dive in deeper into different sources and have just a little bit of curiosity as to the legitimacy of what I'm saying.
- ceejayoz 7y agoLots of aggressive statements about me having "limited sources" and "dive in deeper into different sources" and... no sources. I asked you for sources at the very top of this thread. Instead I got a bunch of defensiveness, which is itself illuminating. Surely this sort of imagery you're talking about is available somewhere, with clear examples from both the experimental group and the control group, demonstrating better results in the experimental? These clinics should present that to the FDA, get the procedures approved, and rake in enormous amounts of cash from health insurance from their arthritis cures.