3 ms·
Yeah, but the real flesh-and-blood human beings receiving the dollars, his point is, are not really people whom most people are all that interested in randomly
by ecuzzillo 16y ago
Yeah, but the real flesh-and-blood human beings receiving the dollars, his point is, are not really people whom most people are all that interested in randomly giving dollars to, like starving people in Africa; they're government bureaucrats who often end up serving to make dollar-givers' lives more difficult.
- gjm11 16y agoExcept that he only made it sound that way by pretending that the people being paid with those tax dollars are taking the money for doing nothing, whereas in fact they are, e.g., teachers and policemen and firefighters, and the government is handing that money to them in exchange for doing their jobs, and their jobs do in fact involve providing public services. In other words, exactly what taxes are meant to be used for. Now, of course it's possible that California is employing incompetent people to do those things, or that it's prioritizing them badly, or that its bureaucratic overhead is much bigger than it should be. But (1) Patrick didn't offer any sort of evidence for any of those things, or even say them, and (2) those things, if true, aren't problems with taxation but with other functions of government. (Unless they're incurable, so that anything paid for by taxes is inevitably going to be done badly; but, living as I do in a country where all sorts of important things are done quite competently using money raised from taxes, I find that difficult to believe.)
- jokermatt999 16y agoDo you have absolutely anything to back up what you're saying, or are you just stating your prejudices?