3 ms·
I tend to use libdjb[0] if I need to use strings in C. Is this library significantly easier? [0] http://www.fefe.de/djb/ http://www.fefe.de/djb/
by gpvos 7y ago
I tend to use libdjb[0] if I need to use strings in C. Is this library significantly easier?
[0] http://www.fefe.de/djb/ http://www.fefe.de/djb/
- gpderetta 7y agofrom the top of that page: (Note: This has not been touched since 2000, use [2] instead) [1] https://www.fefe.de/libowfat/ https://www.fefe.de/libowfat/
- gpvos 7y agoYeah, I may have downloaded it from somewhere else, or just grabbed the string routines out of qmail or some other djb code. I tend to trust djb's code more than someone else's reimplementation of the same interface, which is what libowfat is since it is GPL. Anyway, it was several years ago already that I last did so (but later than 2000).
- gpvos 7y agoAlso, in general, you can expect that if someone links to a site, they will have read the first few lines of that page, and the people who later follow that link will read them too.