4 ms·
Also that is such a contrieved way of saying “no person has ever been harmed in over 26,000 test flights”. There must be something the “due to undue risk” clari
by krisoft 7y ago
Also that is such a contrieved way of saying “no person has ever been harmed in over 26,000 test flights”. There must be something the “due to undue risk” clarification hides.
- geomark 7y agoI read that as there were injuries, but they were due to risks that had to be taken, not risks that were carelessly taken.
- Jamwinner 7y agoWhat risks 'had to' be taken in this context?
- FabHK 7y agoGood point. One could say that nobody has ever been injured or died in civil aviation due to undue risk (except maybe where the captain let his kid fly the jet for a bit, that might be considered "undue"...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroflot_Flight_593 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroflot_Flight_593